![]() |
|
German-American Internees in the United States during WWII (adapted from Arthur D. Jacobs’ research and website: click here for interview with Art.)
Christmas 1943—A celebration not to be found in the photographic histories of Ellis Island. (from Jacobs' web site caption:) The dark years of Ellis Island, 1941 through 1948, remain a secret. Many German Americans found themselves locked up in this place three years after the war in Europe had ended. They were held behind barbed wire fences and iron-barred windows. By 1947 hundreds had already been held for more than five years.
Introduction by Karen E. Ebel kebel@yahoo.com www.gaic.info German Americans are the largest ethnic group in the
U.S. Approximately 60 million Americans claim German ancestry.
German-American loyalty to America’s promise of freedom traces back to the
Revolutionary War. Nevertheless, during Second World War the U.S. government
and many Americans viewed German Americans and others of “enemy
ancestry” as potentially dangerous, particularly recent immigrants. The
Japanese-American World War II experience is well known. Few, however, know
of the European American WWII experience, particularly that of the German
Americans. The government Used many interrelated, constitutionally
questionable methods to control those of enemy ancestry, including
internment, individual and group exclusion from military zones, internee
exchanges for Americans held in Germany, deportation, “alien enemy”
registration requirements, travel restrictions and property confiscation.
The human cost of these civil liberties violations was high: families were
disrupted, reputations destroyed, homes and belongings lost. Meanwhile,
untold numbers of German Americans fought for freedom around the world,
including their ancestral homelands; some were the immediate relatives of
those subject to oppressive restrictions on the home front. Pressured by the
United States, many Latin American governments arrested at least 4,050
German Latin Americans. Most were shipped in dark boat holds to the United
States and interned. At least 2,000 Germans, German Americans and Latin
Americans were later exchanged for Americans and Latin Americans held in
Germany. Some allege that internees were captured to Use as exchange bait.
During WWII our government had to do its utmost to
ensure domestic security against dangerous elements in its midst—but it
should have exercised greater vigilance to protect the liberties of those
most vulnerable because of their ethnic ties to enemy nations. Some were
dangerous, but too many were assumed guilty and never able to prove their
innocence. Admittedly, U.S. wartime governmental actions are difficult to
assess decades later. To prevent possible future erosion of our civil
liberties, however, the federal government must fully review and acknowledge
its wartime civil liberties violations. A comprehensive federal review of
the European American experience has never been done. On 3 August 2001
Senators Russell Feingold (D-WI) and Charles Grassley (R-IA) introduced S.
1356, The European Americans and Refugees Wartime Treatment Study Act in
the U.S. Senate, joined by Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Senator Joseph
Lieberman. This bill would create a much-needed independent commission to
review U.S. government policies directed against European “enemy” ethnic
groups during WWII in the U.S. and Latin America. This commission also would
review the U.S. government’s denial of asylum to European (primarily
Jewish) refugees seeking refuge in the U.S. from persecution in Europe. It
was reported favorably to the Senate by the Senate Judiciary Committee in
March 2002 and renamed The Wartime
Treatment Study Act. The following summarizes two particularly onerous
methods of control—internment and exclusion—and a timeline of related
events: Selective
Internment.
Pursuant to the Alien Enemy Act of 1798 (50 U.S.C 21-24), which remains in
effect today, the U.S. may apprehend, intern and otherwise restrict the
freedom of “alien enemies” upon declaration of war or actual, attempted
or threatened invasion by a foreign nation. During WWII, the U.S. Government
interned at least 11,000 persons of German ancestry. By law, only “enemy
aliens” could be interned; however, with governmental approval, their
family members frequently joined them in the camps. Many such
“voluntarily” interned spouses and children were American citizens.
Internment was frequently based upon uncorroborated, hearsay evidence
gathered by the FBI and other intelligence agencies. Homes were raided and
many ransacked. Fathers, mothers and sometimes both were arrested and
disappeared. Sometimes children left after the arrests had to fend for
themselves. Some were placed in orphanages. DOJ instituted very limited due
process protections for those arrested. Potential internees were held in
custody for weeks in temporary detention centers, such as jails and
hospitals, prior to their hearings. Frequently, their families had no idea
where they were for weeks. The hearings took place before DOJ-constituted
civilian hearing boards. Those arrested were subject to hostile questioning
by the local prosecuting U.S. Attorney, who was assisted by the
investigating FBI agents. The intimidated, frequently semi-fluent accused
had no right to counsel, could not contest the proceedings or question their
accusers. Hearing board recommendations were forwarded to the Alien Enemy
Control Unit of the Department of Justice for a final determination that
could take weeks or months. Internees remained in custody nervously awaiting
DOJ’s order—unconditional release, parole or internment. Policy dictated
that the AECU resolve what it deemed to be questionable hearing board
recommendations in favor of internment. Based on AECU recommendations, the
Attorney General issued internment orders for the duration of the war.
Internees were shipped off to distant camps. Families were torn apart and
lives destroyed. Family members left at home were shunned due to fear of the
FBI and spite. Newspapers published stories and incriminating lists.
Eventually destitute, many families lost their homes and had to apply to the
government to join spouses in family camps, apply for welfare and/or rely on
other family members who could afford to support them. Eventually, under
such duress, hundreds of internees agreed to repatriate to war-torn Germany
to be exchanged with their children for Americans. Once there, food was
scarce, Allied bombs were falling and their German families could do little
to help them. Many regretted their decision. Considering the spurious
allegations, which led to the internment of a majority of internees, their
treatment by our government was harsh indeed. Their experience provides
ample evidence of why our civil liberties are so precious. Exclusion.
In cooperation with the War Department, DOJ created a network of restricted
areas. Enemy aliens were forbidden to enter or remain in certain areas and
their movements severely restricted in others. The restrictions imposed
great hardship on those living or working in these areas. Pursuant to
Presidential Executive Order 9066, the military could restrict the liberties
of citizens and aliens, as it deemed necessary. This led to the exclusion of
individuals and groups from extensive “military zones” comprising over a
third of the U.S. The most well-known group exclusion was the massive
Japanese American relocation from the West Coast. Several hundred individual
exclusion orders were issued. The government was particularly suspicious of
naturalized citizens of enemy ethnicity. Citizens could not be interned, so
the military threatened those it deemed dangerous with exclusion. Many felt
contesting exclusion orders was futile and moved before an order was
actually issued. Unlike group exclusion, hearings were required for
individual exclusion. Resembling enemy alien internment hearings, these
hearings were subject to very limited due process protections, clearly
violating the rights of American citizens. If an exclusion order was issued
following a hearing, excludees were given little time to depart. Homes were
abandoned. Some excludees left their families behind. FBI agents followed
them to their new communities. The government often advised police and
employers how “dangerous” excludees were, so finding and keeping jobs
was difficult. Little or government resettlement assistance was given to
excludees. Some contested their exclusion orders in court, protesting the
government’s violation of their due process rights. After several federal
courts found the military’s actions of questionable constitutionality, the
individual exclusion program decreased in popularity. Although more unusual,
in lieu of exclusion the government also sought to denaturalize citizens, so
they could be interned as enemy aliens or deported.
Survey of Internment and Detention Centers
Internee-Camp Crystal City/Texas | Ellis Island as an Internee Prison | Map of Internment Camps
Conclusion by
Karen E. Ebel Thanks to federal legislation and effective activism by their ethnic group, U.S. government mistreatment of Japanese Americans is well known. After almost 60 years, the German American experience remains buried. The few surviving, aged internees remember their experiences well, despite years of trying to forget. Their memories haunt them. Mostly, because they are Americans who revere freedom, they want the dreadful saga of their wartime mistreatment told so it will never happen again. The CWRIC reviewed a significant portion of government’s discriminatory wartime policies. Another commission should be established immediately to complete the study of these policies as they affected European Americans, particularly German Americans. Related ResourcesFreedom of Information Times website | National Archives link
|
(the above two photos used courtesy of John Christgau)
Credits
When
asked how TRACES should credit the research behind this page, co-creator
Arthur D. Jacobs responded:
You can list my name and town, Tempe, Arizona.... and
my second home and farm, Morton County, Kansas [which was home, according to
him, of the “most loving persons from Kansas—which I now call my home...and where I now own part
of the farm that I grew up on upon returning from war-torn, starving Germany.
You can read about this connection in my book The Prison Called Hohenasperg:
An American Boy Betrayed by His Government during World War II. ”].
About Arthur Jacobs' Book The Prison Called Hohenasperg: An American boy betrayed by his Government during World War II, ISBN 1-58112-832-0
When he arrived in Germany in the dead of winter he was transported to Hohenasperg in a frigid, stench-filled, locked, and heavily guarded, boxcar. Once in Hohenasperg, he was separated from his family and put in a prison cell. He was only twelve years old! He was treated like a Nazi by the U.S. Army guards and was told that if he didn't behave he would be killed. He tried to tell them he was an American, but they just told him to shut up. His fellow inmates included high-ranking officers of the Third Reich who were being held for interrogation and denazification. The book tells how the author survived this ordeal and many others, and how he fought his way back to his beloved America. |
Book Reviews
A review of The Prison Called Hohenasperg: An American boy betrayed by his
Government during World War II is contained on page 485 (The Manley Arts
Review) of the American Library Association’s Booklist
Magazine of November 1, 1999. Statements from this and other reviewers
follow:
|
This book can be ordered online from upublish. It is also available through your favorite bookseller.
![]() |
A school-room scene at Camp Crystal City in Texas (courtesy of Art Jacobs; used with permission) | ![]() |
Epilog: Emails to TRACES from Art Jacobs adjacobs@cox.net view interview with Art
In September and October 2004 I went on a 15-day trip to Germany, where I had the rare opportunity to visit the Hohenasperg Prison (still a prison). While there I was a given a tour of the prison by the director. During the tour we “bumped” into a nurse who had been working there for 23 years; this nurse had heard about my story on German radio. He knew of the Hangman’s Tree, der Galgen (the gallows) as he referred to it. The tree was destroyed by lightning in 1956. Before the tour ended this nurse presented me with an actual key that was used on my cell door. The key is 6.5 inches long, and the barrel’s inside diameter is 3.8 inches. I am enclosing a photograph of the key. The 2.5-hour tour of inside the prison was quite an emotional event for me. Thought this would be of interest to you.
Art
Email sent 5 March 2005:
Here are the results of my latest state-by-state research regarding the teaching (or not) of German-American internees’ experiences during World War II (see http://www.foitimes.com/internment/SocialStudiesMarch2005.htm):
| STATE | Social Study Standard Includes Japanese American Internment | Social Study Standard Includes German American Internment | Contact | ||||||
| Alabama | Yes | No | abuckley@alsde.edu | ||||||
| Alaska | No | No | |||||||
| Arizona | Yes | No | cwarren@ade.az.gov | ||||||
| Arkansas | Yes | No | smckenzie@arkedu.k12.ar.us | ||||||
| California | Yes | No | webmaster@score.rims.k12.ca.us | ||||||
| Colorado1 | Yes | No | gross_l@cde.state.co.us (Lois Gross) | ||||||
| Connecticut2 | Yes | No | dan.gregg@po.state.ct.us | ||||||
| Delaware3 | No | No | |||||||
| Florida | No | No | |||||||
| Georgia | Yes | No | lpijanow@doe.k12.ga.us | ||||||
| Hawaii | Yes | No | atr@k12.hi.us | ||||||
| Idaho | Yes | No | Dr. Marilyn Howard mhoward@sde.state.id.us | ||||||
| Illinois | Yes | No | rmccabe@isbe.net | ||||||
| Indiana | No | No | |||||||
| Iowa | No | No | |||||||
| Kansas | Yes | No | dmatthis@ksde.org | ||||||
| Kentucky | Yes | No | phurt@kde.state.ky.us | ||||||
| Louisiana | Yes | No | SuperintendentPicard@la.gov | ||||||
| Maine | No | No | |||||||
| Maryland | Yes | No | http://mdk12.org/interact/feedback.asp | ||||||
| Massachusetts | Yes | No | swheltle@doe.mass.edu | ||||||
| Michigan4 | Yes | No | MDEweb@michigan.gov | ||||||
| Minnesota | Yes | No | mde.webmaster@state.mn.us | ATTN: Ms. Beth Aune | |||||
| Mississippi | Yes | No | tgreen@mde.k12.ms.us | Ms. Green | |||||
| Missouri | No | No | |||||||
| Montana | No | No | |||||||
| Nebraska | No | No | |||||||
| Nevada | Yes | No | gdopf@doe.nv.gov | Ms. Dopf | |||||
| New Hampshire | No | No | |||||||
| New Jersey | Yes | No | https://www.state.nj.us/njded/parents/contact.htm | ||||||
| New Mexico5 | No | No | |||||||
| New York | Yes | No | emscurric@mail.nysed.gov | ||||||
| North Carolina6 | Yes | No | tgreggs@dpi.state.nc.us | ||||||
| North Dakota | No | No | |||||||
| Ohio | Yes | No | susan.zelman@ode.state.oh.us | ||||||
| Oklahoma | Yes | No | sharon_lease@sde.state.ok.us | ||||||
| Oregon | Yes | No | doug.kosty@state.or.us | ||||||
| Pennsylvania | Yes | No | Secretary Barnes secretary@psupen.psu.edu | ||||||
| Rhode Island | Yes | No | schaefer@ride.ri.net | ||||||
| South Carolina | No | No | |||||||
| South Dakota | No | No | |||||||
| Tennessee | No | No | |||||||
| Texas | Yes | No | paiweb@tea.state.tx.us;and paigis@tea.state.tx.us | ||||||
| Utah | Yes | No | mpetersen@media.utah.edu | ||||||
| Vermont | Yes | No | davidwhite@education.state.vt.us | ||||||
| Virginia | Yes | No | instruction@mail.vak12ed.edu | ||||||
| Washington | Yes | No | Professor Perkins cperkins@ospi.wednet.edu | ||||||
| West Virginia | No | No | |||||||
| Wisconsin | Yes | No | madeline.uraneck@dpi.state.wi.us | ||||||
| Wyoming | Yes | No | tblank@educ.state.wy.us | Superintendent Ted Blankenship | |||||
| Total | 50 | 50 | |||||||
| Yes | 34 | 0 | |||||||
| No | 16 | 50 | |||||||
| United States History Standards | Yes | No | gnash@ucla.edu | ||||||
| US Department of Education7 | Yes | No | Only through on site form at http://www.ed.gov/about/contacts/gen/index.html?src=gu | ||||||
| 1Colorado -Has a library reference that denies German Americans were interned | |||||||||
| 2Connecticut has four links that only refer to Japanese American internment. See page http://www.state.ct.us/sde/dtl/curriculum/currsocs_toler.htm | |||||||||
| 3Delaware has reference to Japanese American internment in its English content standard. See http://www.doe.state.de.us/Standards/English/ELA_Standards.html | |||||||||
| 4 Michigan entry relates to the Children's Civic book listing that contains two books relating to Japanese American internment and none to German American internment. | |||||||||
| 5 New Miexico has a reference to internment camps--but no mention is made of ethnicity | |||||||||
| 6 North Carolina uses two books that discuss Japanese American internment -- no mention made of German American internment. | |||||||||
| 7 Please note that the US Department of Education site is replete with references to Japanese American internment | |||||||||
| and not one reference was found relative to German American internment | |||||||||
| Prepared by AD Jacobs, March 2005 | |||||||||
Disclaimer:
Art Jacobs